Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+160%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL
(215-0821065)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.313 billion
Unknown
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
