Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 32GB VRAM Radeon AI PRO R9700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 's Advantages
Boost Clock2920MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon AI PRO R9700
+349%
47.84 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2025
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1660 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2920 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
256
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
373.8 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
747.5 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
95.68 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.84 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1495 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 48
-
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
Unknown
Transistors
53.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
