Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA P106 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 6GB VRAM P106 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1709MHz
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+143%
10.65 TFLOPS
P106 100
4.375 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1709 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
256
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
82.03 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
136.7 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
68.36 GFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.375 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-100-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
