Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 575W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Boost Clock2407MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 5090
+884%
104.8 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2025
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
2017 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR7
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.79TB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
170
4096
Shading Units
21760
256
TMUs
680
256
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
680
-
RT Cores
170
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
423.6 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1637 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
104.8 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.8 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.637 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
575W
450 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GB202
-
GPU Variant
GB202-300-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
92.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
750 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
12.0
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
