Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 425W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
10496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 D
+590%
73.54 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
2280 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1008GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
114
4096
Shading Units
14592
256
TMUs
456
256
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
456
-
RT Cores
114
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1149 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
73.54 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.54 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1149 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
425W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-250-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
