Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+273%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
10.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
