Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+1634%
10.65 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2011
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.64 billion
Unknown
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0
