Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Boost Clock1645MHz
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +126%
4.632 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
May 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1408
64
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net