Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
+300%
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
