Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2
+175%
5.632 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Jun 2014
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
580W
200 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT
(215-0852000)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
