Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+185%
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
