Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+203%
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1024
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
219W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
