Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 43W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+293%
2.048 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
400
64
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.627 billion
Unknown
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0
