ATI Mobility Radeon X1900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Mobility Radeon X1900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (30.08GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
48 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2009
M6x
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
470 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
30.08GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
48
12
TMUs
16
12
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
M68
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GS
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1
