Matrox Millenium P650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM Millenium P650 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2003
Release Date
Jan 2009
Parhelia
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
230 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
64MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
7.360GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
-
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
2
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
460.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
1.840 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Parhelia-LX
GPU Name
GT200B
MP-A4L
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Parhelia
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
150 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
130 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
8.1
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
1.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0
