Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA L4 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA L4 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L4 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA L4 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 72W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L4 +5195%
30.29 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

795 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
300.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
60
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

163.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
30.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
30.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
473.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

72W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GK107
AD104-???-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net