NVIDIA L20 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM L20 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA L20 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
11736 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
L20
+185368%
59.35 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Tesla Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
92
SM Count
-
11776
Shading Units
40
368
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
368
Tensor Cores
-
92
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
322.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
927.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
59.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
59.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
927.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
275W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV620
AD102
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
