NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
+228%
1.88 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tegra
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
29.38 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
3.760 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.880 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
940.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GK107
TE980M-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
