Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB +156%
1.88 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Tegra
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
29.38 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
3.760 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.880 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
940.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
GK107
TE980M-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net