NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
+306%
1.88 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tegra
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
29.38 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
3.760 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.880 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
940.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GT200B
TE980M-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
