NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (15W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1.28 TFLOPS
GRID K2
+78%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2013
Tegra
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
