Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.534 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +46%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
May 2015
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy