Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs AMD FirePro A320
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1100MHz vs 955MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
+92%
1.408 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
20
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
0 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
22.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
44.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
2.816 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1408 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
352.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
