Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G4 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1400MHz vs 1100MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G4
0.845 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+154%
2.15 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Xe Graphics G4
751
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+72%
1292
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Xe Graphics G4
355
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+72%
612
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
12
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
0 MB
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
13.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
26.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.301 TFLOPS
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Generation 12.2
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
146 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
