Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Intel Arc 130T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G4 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 130T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Intel Arc 130T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (2200MHz vs 1100MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G4
0.845 TFLOPS
Arc 130T Mobile
+366%
3.942 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Xe Graphics G4
751
Arc 130T Mobile
+359%
3448
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Xe Graphics G4
355
Arc 130T Mobile
+361%
1638
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
12
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
112
-
RT Cores
7
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
0 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
13.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
61.60 GPixel/s
26.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
146 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
