Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1400MHz
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+2262%
2.15 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
