Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 580 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (950MHz vs 905MHz)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 580
+57%
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
24
9
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.550 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
68.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
273.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Skylake GT4e
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 9.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm+
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
