Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 3000 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
+2528%
0.736 TFLOPS
Radeon 3000 IGP
0.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
HD Graphics
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
40
40
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.400 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.00 GFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
RS780
-
GPU Variant
RS780L
Generation 7.5
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
-
22 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.18 billion
Unknown
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.0
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
