Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Intel GMA X4500
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1150MHz
240 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA X4500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
+765%
0.736 TFLOPS
GMA X4500
0.085 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
HD Graphics
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
80
40
TMUs
10
4
ROPs
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
533.0 MPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.330 GTexel/s
-
-
-
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
85.28 GFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Eaglelake
-
-
-
Generation 7.5
Architecture
Generation 5.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
22 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0
4.3
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
