Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs AMD FirePro A320
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1150MHz vs 955MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.736 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Generation 7.5
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
22 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
