Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 650 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1150MHz vs 1100MHz)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Plus Graphics 650
0.883 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
+91%
1.69 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Plus Graphics 650
551
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
+134%
1292
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Plus Graphics 650
256
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
+139%
612
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Sep 2020
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
6
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
1.766 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.379 TFLOPS
883.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.690 TFLOPS
220.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
422.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU Name
Tiger Lake GT2
-
-
-
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 12.1
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm++
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
