Intel Core i9 14900K vs Intel Pentium 350
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 14900K with 24 cores 3.2GHz and Pentium 350 with 2 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core i9 14900K 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 3MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 32nm)
Intel Pentium 350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 125W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2023
Release Date
Nov 2011
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Raptor Lake Refresh
Core Architecture
Sandy Bridge
i9-14900K
Processor Number
-
LGA-1700
Socket
Intel Socket 1155
UHD Graphics 770
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Generation
Pentium (Sandy Bridge)
Package
-
Transistor Count
0.504 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
-
-
-
125 W
Power Consumption
15 W
253 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
Intel
257 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
-
16
Performance Core Threads
-
3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
16
Efficiency Cores
-
16
Efficiency Core Threads
-
2.4 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.4 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
24
Total Core Count
2
32
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32x
Multiplier
12.0
-
-
-
80 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
3 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
-
-
-
1
SMP
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
Memory Parameters
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3
192 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
89.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1650 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
256
Shader Units
-
16
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
32
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
-
-
-
0.78 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
AI Accelerator
-
-
-
-
-
-
