Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1358MHz
Lower TDP (95W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +112%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
12 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
95W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy