Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
8176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+56630%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
8192
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
17W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
