Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+2204%
14.75 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
LPDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
8192
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
10W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
