Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
8192
256
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
500W
900 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
8 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
