Intel Arc 140V vs AMD FirePro A320
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 115% (2050MHz vs 955MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arc 140V
+459%
4.1 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2024
Release Date
Jun 2012
Battlemage
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
System Shared
LPDDR5x
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
0
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.1 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
100W
W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
Outputs
No outputs
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
GPU Name
Devastator
GPU Variant
A320
Xe2
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
3 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12.2
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
