Intel HD Graphics vs AMD FirePro A320
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel HD Graphics 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1000MHz vs 955MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics
0.096 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
+663%
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
48
Shading Units
384
6
TMUs
24
1
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
24.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Ivy Bridge GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Generation 7.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
22 nm
Process Size
32 nm
0.392 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
94 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.0
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
