Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs AMD FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 4000 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel HD Graphics 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1000MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 4000
0.256 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
+171%
0.695 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
128
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
2
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
256.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Ivy Bridge GT2
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 7.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
22 nm
Process Size
32 nm
1.2 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
133 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.0
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
