Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (2520MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada
+3801%
92.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Unknown
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
144
768
Shading Units
18432
48
TMUs
576
24
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
800W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
