Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1845MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT
+118%
5.196 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Oct 2019
H3C Graphics
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1670 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1408
48
TMUs
88
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.4 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
