Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA NVS 1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM NVS 1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+678%
2.381 TFLOPS
NVS 1000
0.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Unknown
H3C Graphics
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
