Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs Moore Threads MTT S10

Intel H3C XG310 vs Moore Threads MTT S10

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM MTT S10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Moore Threads MTT S10 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +16%
2.381 TFLOPS
MTT S10
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Oct 2023
H3C Graphics
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
SM Count
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
GPU Variant
Generation 12.1
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
95 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net