Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 430 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+785%
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430 OEM
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Oct 2010
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
49W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.585 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
