Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+6005%
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Oct 2009
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
31W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.26 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
