Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro S9050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050
+35%
3.226 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Aug 2014
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
12GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.313 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
