Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 6510

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 6510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM 141 GB and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1980MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
16496 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (39W vs 700W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H200 SXM 141 GB +12767%
66.91 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6510
0.52 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2024
Release Date
May 2011
Server Hopper
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1593 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

141GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4.89TB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
400
528
TMUs
20
24
ROPs
8
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
50 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
1045 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
267.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
66.91 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
33.45 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

700W
TDP
39W
1100 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GH100
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO (215-0757004)
Hopper
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
80 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net