NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM 141 GB and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1980MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 22.18GB/s)
16776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 700W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H200 SXM 141 GB
+34931%
66.91 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3750
0.191 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2024
Release Date
Sep 2008
Server Hopper
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1593 MHz
Memory Clock
693 MHz
Memory
141GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4.89TB/s
Bandwidth
22.18GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
120
528
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.184 GPixel/s
1045 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.368 GTexel/s
267.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
66.91 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
191.0 GFLOPS
33.45 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
700W
TDP
65W
1100 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GH100
GPU Name
RV635
-
GPU Variant
RV635 PRO
(215-0682008)
Hopper
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
80 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1
