NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM 141 GB and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1980MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
16824 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 700W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H200 SXM 141 GB
+35490%
66.91 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2024
Release Date
Feb 2010
Server Hopper
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1593 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
141GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4.89TB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
132
SM Count
9
16896
Shading Units
72
528
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
1045 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
267.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
66.91 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
33.45 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
700W
TDP
43W
1100 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GH100
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Hopper
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
80 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1
