NVIDIA H200 NVL vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 141GB VRAM H200 NVL and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H200 NVL
+466%
60.32 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Server Hopper
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1593 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
141GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
4.89TB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
4096
528
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
256
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
942.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
241.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
60.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
30.16 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
150W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GH100
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
-
-
Hopper
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
80 billion
Transistors
Unknown
814 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5
